Isaiah
45:1-7
Psalm 96:
1-9 [10-13]
1
Thessalonians 1:1-10
Matthew 22:15-22
Narrative:
2 Samuel 12:1-9 and Psalm 51:1-9
First Lesson: Isaiah 45:1-7
Challenges:
Wait, who is Cyrus? What’s going on? You
know someone will be wondering that. Other people will simply hear, “Blah,
blah, blah…Bible words…blah, blah, blah.” This is even more of an issue if you
are NOT preaching on this text than if you are. If you have the chance to do
this, why not give a quick explanation before the reading begins so that people
at least have the chance to understand what’s going on here?
Opportunities:
I once heard a medical nurse give an
excellent “witness” to his blossoming faith and relationship with God. As he
looked back on his life in medicine and healthcare he was able to see ways that
God had strengthened him, inspired him, guided his hand while caring for people,
even though at the time he didn’t recognize God. It makes me think of verse 5 where God says
about Cyrus, “I arm you, even though you do not know me.” Just because you don’t
notice God, doesn’t mean God isn’t there!
Good
News:
There is no other god but God. Frankly,
I am very happy to know that Molech, Baal and Zeus aren’t running around because
they scare the #$%* out of me.
Second Lesson: 1 Thessalonians 1:1-10
Challenges:
This probably shows much more of my own
emotional and spiritual baggage than anything else, but verse 4 brings me
questions. Paul says that God has “chosen you.” That’s wonderful and awesome
and all of that. But if God chooses the people in this congregation of
Thessalonians, why didn’t God choose other people as well? I know this is going
down a “rabbit hole” of sorts, but I imagine some people of the Thessalonians
wondered this as well. They obviously had family members and friends who did
accept Christ. Why didn’t they? They
probably had some wonderful neighbors who they really, really liked and cared
for…who still worshipped the old gods.
They might have has some of the angst I feel when I hear talk of who is
chosen. I don’t know what you do with
this, but it’s a challenge I face!
Also, Paul talks about how Jesus rescues
them (and us) from the “wrath that is coming.” That might be a way of
describing atonement that makes you uncomfortable. Just remember that there is
no ONE AND ONLY atonement theory and that Paul is in the canon and you are not.
Opportunities:
Since this is the beginning of the
epistle, this could be an excellent chance to talk about what a First Century
Christian Congregation might have been like. Relatively small, meeting in
houses, gathered around a common meal.
Some things were probably very familiar to us: differences of opinion
about how things should happen, people who were loud talkers, people who were
very quiet, people who could count on, people who talked a good game but didn’t
come through. In short: you’d have a group of people.
At the same time there would have been
some major differences too: the complete and total radical nature of rich and
poor people, slaves and free people, Jews and Gentiles worshipping together
would have been HUGE. Yes, it’s huge today too and yes Sunday Morning is one of
the most segregated times in America, but it would have been even more amazing
2,000 years ago.
And don’t forget the persecution they
faced. Something tells me that it was 1000% worse than anything people in the
U.S. of A face.
What a great opportunity to paint a
picture of Christian Life in community.
Good
News:
Here is yet another example of people
being blessed (see verses 4 and 5) and they themselves become blessings to
others (see verse 6) by becoming imitators of both Paul and the Lord. They are not only saved and delivered from
wrath, they are empowered and given a purpose.
There is meaning in their life: both collectively and individually. That’s
a big deal and it gets me excited.
Gospel: Matthew 22:15-22
Challenges:
Many of the commentators I have read
speak about the “dubious” interpretations of this story (i.e. God doesn’t care
about how you spend your money, just about your heart, or that God and politics
should be kept separate, etc.). I believe that they are certainly right. But we
have to be careful in how we preach this. I’m getting tired of reading articles
online about the seven or ten or twelve “things I am doing wrong.” I get it: I’m
doing lots of things wrong, I know. It gets old when people who think they know
more than I do try to keep telling me this.
I think people “in the pews” can feel the same way if their pastor keeps
trying to tell them, over and over again, how they are looking at this story in
the wrong way. Maybe they are! But as Andy Stanley has said, “Do you want to
make a point or do you want to make a difference?” You could preach a sermon on
this text that gets EVERYTHING “right” but if it turns off your audience so
that all they hear is, ‘I’m a pastor and I’m smarter than you, aren’t you glad
I put up with you all?” then your “right” sermon has failed miserably.
Opportunities:
I really love the opening line of Prof.
Lance Pape’s commentary for this text on the Working Preacher website: “Politically, just about the only thing
Pharisees and Herodians have in common is that they don’t like Jesus.” Think about all of the crazy political
alliances, back-stabbings, log-jams and various “silly things” that happen in
our own country. Perhaps you could
invite your people to think about the craziness of politics (heavily dipped in
religion) of Jesus’ day. That could set
the tone for your sermon. Imagine Jesus
going on “Meet the Press” or another show like this. The Herodians and the Pharisees are hoping he’ll
say something that will provide a sound-byte they can show again and again
until his “campaign” is ruined.
From The
People’s New Testament Commentary (go buy it right now if you haven’t
already): “While Matthew is clear that loyalty to God is a different and higher
category than loyalty to Caesar, this text is not instruction on how people who
live in a complex world of competing loyalties may determine what belongs to
Caesar (as some things do) and what belongs to God (the ultimate loyalty) must
be made, and it leaves it to readers in their own situations to be “Jesus
theologians” who, in the light of Jesus’ life and teachings, will make their
own decisions in such situations.” (pg. 87)
From N.T. Wright’s For Everyone series: (go buy it too) “We can only fully understand what
Jesus was doing when we see his answer in the light of the whole story. Jesus
knew-he had already told his disciples-that we was himself going to be
crucified, to share the fate of the tax-rebels of his boyhood. He wasn’t trying to wriggle out of personal
or political danger. He was continuing to walk straight towards it. But he was
doing so on his own terms. His vocation
was not to be the sort of revolutionary they had known. The kingdom of God would defeat the kingdom
of Caesar, not by conventional means, but by the victory of God’s love and
power over the even greater empire of death itself…” (Matthew, vol. 2 pg. 88)
Good
News:
I believe that Jesus is showing us that
life is both very simple (God is #1) and very complicated (how do we live in a
world where there are competing forces demanding our loyalty?!?!) all at the
same time. It’s as if he is giving us
permission to name our world as complicated.
That is a relief! Now that we have that out of the way we can get down
to the business of following him: stumbling imperfectly as we do, trusting that
the Holy Spirit will grab us by the shoulders and put us right again and again.
Narrative:2 Samuel 12:1-9; Psalm 51:1-9
Challenges:
When you think about it, it’s too bad
that even hear Bathsheba is considered something as “less-than-human” (i.e. a
lamb). We don’t really get to hear her
voice or her side of the story for any of this story, and that’s much too bad
as well. You could go off on this…or you
could put this story by Nathan in context.
Emphasize the revolutionary and groundbreaking nature of Nathan’s
message. For most of history (and plenty
of the present-day as well), David’s actions are simply “the way things work.”
Kings and bosses “get what they want.” Many people who are connected with power
would simply shrug. But God doesn’t
shrug, God doesn’t cast a blind-eye, God sends Nathan instead.
Also, it will be a great challenge to
deal with David here. David is an adulterer and murderer. Absolutely,
positively. There’s no sugar-coating that.
At the same time, if we just simply dismiss him as one of “those guys”
or one of “them,” that misses the point as well. It’d be much easier to write David off as a
“bad guy” and that’s it. But we have to
look at David in a more complicated way.
We need to be aware that ALL of us are susceptible to the corrupting
influence of power wherever we are. We
might not be open murder and adultery, but we ALL have the chance to abuse
power me might have.
Opportunities:
Many people might be familiar with the
phrase that “power corrupts” and that “absolute power corrupts
absolutely.” This certainly seems to be
the case today. Until Nathan arrives
there is no accountability for David, no one holding him up to a higher
standard. As a pastor in a “solo call” I
am very much aware of the need for accountability. It’s a very important thing. This could be a
great opportunity to talk about accountability in the context of your
listener’s lives: a work, in the family, etc.
We ALL have places were he have some
power…it might be on the same level as David, but we do. How do we use it? How
do we react when we realize that we have misused it? What does our relationship
with God look like when this happens?
Good
News:
I’ve said this before (many times) and I’ll
say it again: GOD CARES ABOUT HOW WE TREAT EACH OTHER. God doesn’t just fly by
and say, “Hey, you guys are still sacrificing to me? Great, I’ll be back later…”
God cares about how the powerful act, God is a God of accountability and
justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment